<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C#: Smaller syntax for event handlers.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kristofmattei.be/2008/12/16/c-smaller-syntax-for-event-handlers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kristofmattei.be/2008/12/16/c-smaller-syntax-for-event-handlers/</link>
	<description>A blog on my experiences in programming, work, and life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:31:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mawi</title>
		<link>http://kristofmattei.be/2008/12/16/c-smaller-syntax-for-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>mawi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristofmattei.be/?p=471#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>Make your line more concise: Console.Writeline doesn&#039;t need String.Format, it is implicit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make your line more concise: Console.Writeline doesn&#8217;t need String.Format, it is implicit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoami</title>
		<link>http://kristofmattei.be/2008/12/16/c-smaller-syntax-for-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>whoami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristofmattei.be/?p=471#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Which to choose ... it all depends.
In must circumstances, I still favor the first approach.  In most of the situations, I still find it much easier to understand, especially when your event-handler logic contains multiple lines of code.

In some other situations, I use lambda&#039;s or anonymous delegates.  However, I only do this when :
- the code in the eventhandler is short
- should not be used in any other places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which to choose &#8230; it all depends.<br />
In must circumstances, I still favor the first approach.  In most of the situations, I still find it much easier to understand, especially when your event-handler logic contains multiple lines of code.</p>
<p>In some other situations, I use lambda&#8217;s or anonymous delegates.  However, I only do this when :<br />
- the code in the eventhandler is short<br />
- should not be used in any other places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarina</title>
		<link>http://kristofmattei.be/2008/12/16/c-smaller-syntax-for-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kristofmattei.be/?p=471#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Heb ge weeral van die gekke computer dinges op u site,
Jeezes:P
Ik kan er niet aan uit^^
Maar goed dat gij er nog aan uitkunt!

x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heb ge weeral van die gekke computer dinges op u site,<br />
Jeezes:P<br />
Ik kan er niet aan uit^^<br />
Maar goed dat gij er nog aan uitkunt!</p>
<p>x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

