Android: delete Amazon MP3

First of all, you need root. I use CyanogenMod on my Nexus One.

To delete the application you hook up the shell:

adb shell
#cd /data/app

This removes the application but does not remove the system reference.

When you go to Settings > Applications > Manage applications you still will see

To remove that system reference do this:

abd shell
#pm uninstall

Hope it helps.


C# to VB.NET, && and And and AndAlso

There is a difference in operators when a C# developer has to do VB.NET

For example: && vs And.

THEY ARE NOT THE SAME. The && equivalent in VB.NET is AndAlso

If you do this:

Sub Main()
    Dim result = Part1() And Part2()

End Sub

Function Part1() As Boolean
    Console.WriteLine("Part 1")
    Return False
End Function

Function Part2() As Boolean
    Console.WriteLine("Part 2")
    Return True
End Function

What do you think it prints?

If And would behave like && in C# it would print

Part 1

But unfortunately BASIC is different (sigh), it prints

Part 1

Part 2

This can be solved by using AndAlso, which is the short circuited version of And.

Entity Framework 4.0 improvements

I’ve been a huge fan of LINQ to SQL. But EF 3.5 (first release) didn’t quite do it for me. I didn’t like the lack of support for foreign keys, no Single() LINQ support,

No Single support

An example of lack of foreign keys:

using(NorthwindEntities northwindEntities = new NorthwindEntities())
    Product p = new Product()
                    Category = northwindEntities.Categories.Where(c => c.CategoryID == 1).First,
                    ProductName = "French fries",
                    UnitPrice = 20,
                    Discontinued = false,
                    QuantityPerUnit = "1 kg bag",
                    Supplier = northwindEntities.Suppliers.Where(s => s.SupplierID == 1).First



As you can see you need to fetch  the category and the Supplier seperatly. You can’t just do CategoryID = 1

But when we launch the wizard for EF 4.0 we get this:

Include foreign key columns in the model

Which results in this:

using(NorthwindEntities northwindEntities = new NorthwindEntities())
    Product p = new Product()
                    CategoryID = 1,
                    ProductName = "French fries",
                    UnitPrice = 20,
                    Discontinued = false,
                    QuantityPerUnit = "1 kg bag",
                    SupplierID = 1



And there is Single support!

using(NorthwindEntities ne = new NorthwindEntities())
    var result = ne.Suppliers.Where(sup => sup.SupplierID == 1).Single();

So it just got a little more mature.

I’m hoping to be able to test it (and use it!) more in the future and new projects 🙂

Hope it helps


VB.NET: getting rid of With statements

Because With clutters your code, you get too much indentations and it removes readability. Now I saw code with 4 to 5 times nested With statements. Pure Horror. So my first job was to remove all these statements. But what if you get ambiguous Methods/Properties?

The documentation is clear on that:

However, because members of outer statements are masked inside the inner statements, you must provide a fully qualified object reference in an inner With block to any member of an object in an outer With block.

This means that in an inner with block you cannot access the members of the outer with block with the . qualified name. You need the full qualified name.

So when you need to de-with your code you start from the outside, taking the most outer block first, solving the references, building, removing the next one, and so on…

But you shouldn’t use With statements in the first place.

Just name your variable if you don’t want to enter the fully qualified name for every statement.

VB.NET, why I don’t like it

A little introduction: I’m working on some legacy VB.NET & Excel project. Pretty old stuff, quite the challenge of getting through the code. I’ve discovered multiple things about VB.NET which I didn’t knew (like the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace, late binding, Option Strict).

The code I’m working with is cluttered with these kinds of abominations to the .NET framework. The Microsoft.VisualBasic is purely there for legacy VBA developers so that they can easily transfer to VB.NET.

But that doesn’t mean you need to use it in new projects (vbNullString? C’mon…)

I think that this namespace shouldn’t be offered by default anymore in new VB.NET projects. It should be there to merely quickly convert old VBA projects to .NET.

Late binding is another thing which I truly hate. It gets compiled to a bunch of reflection calls which make your code more error prone (no compiler checking!). Although I’ve managed to cast the System.__ComObject to it’s corresponding interface most of the time I had to resort to reflection one time myself (shame shame).

And finally there is this problem of cluttered code, for some reason, when I look at VB.NET code there is SO much text and all the essence get’s lost! While the C# code is so clean.

I will write a post about cleaning up With statements + best practices for nested With Statements from VB.NET code pretty soon.

Multi-Column ListView

Ever wanted to have a multi column ListView in WPF? It’s not that hard once you get to know WPF.

We take a ListView and set the ItemsPanel to UniformGrid:

<Window x:Class="ColumnTest.MainWindow"
        Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
    <ListView x:Name="MyList">
                <UniformGrid Columns="3" />
                <Label Content="{Binding}" />


And the backend code:

using System.Windows;

namespace ColumnTest
    /// <summary>
    /// Interaction logic for MainWindow.xaml
    /// </summary>
    public partial class MainWindow : Window
        public MainWindow()

            for (int x = 0; x <= 100; x++)


Which results in:

Uniform Grid Result